Skip to main content
Главная страница » Tennis » Angeloni, Leonardo vs Sabaliauskas, Ainius

Angeloni, Leonardo vs Sabaliauskas, Ainius

Expert Analysis: Angeloni vs Sabaliauskas

The upcoming match between Leonardo Angeloni and Ainius Sabaliauskas promises to be a riveting contest, showcasing the dynamic playstyles of both competitors. Angeloni, known for his aggressive baseline game, will likely face challenges against Sabaliauskas’s exceptional defensive skills and counter-attacking prowess. This clash of styles suggests a closely contested first set, with both players vying for dominance. The prediction for no tiebreak in the first set stands at 94.00, indicating a high likelihood of a decisive winner in the initial games.

Angeloni, Leonardo

LWLLW
-

Sabaliauskas, Ainius

WWLLW
Date: 2025-09-04
Time: 17:00
(FT)
Venue: Not Available Yet
Score: 0-2

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)93.90%(0-2)
Over 1st Set Games76.90%(0-2)
Under 1st Set Games58.40%(0-2)
Tie Break in Match (No)81.70%(0-2)
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)66.70%(0-2)
Under 2.5 Sets68.20%(0-2)
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)55.90%(0-2)

Betting Predictions

  • Over 1st Set Games: With a probability of 74.30, expect a lengthy first set characterized by extended rallies and strategic play from both sides.
  • Under 1st Set Games: At 55.10, there is a moderate chance the first set will conclude swiftly, potentially through a break of serve early on.
  • Tie Break in Match (No): With odds of 84.20, it is anticipated that the match will avoid tiebreaks entirely, suggesting decisive breaks in service games.
  • Total Games 3-Way (Under 22): At 64.30, the match is expected to be relatively short, with fewer than 22 total games played across all sets.
  • Under 2.5 Sets: With a probability of 68.80, the match is likely to conclude in straight sets or one tiebreak set.
  • Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5): At 59.80, this indicates a strong possibility that the total number of games will remain under 22.5, pointing towards a decisive outcome in fewer sets.